Best WordPress HOSTING 2018Best WordPress HOSTING 2018��
��Wordpress hosting providers. We measured the most important factors of a web host and we'll walk you through different aspects of their performance. Finding the best Wordpress hosting and sharing Wordpress hosting usually has traditionally been the first part of a call for those new to self-hosted WordPress.
The combination of server administration, low monthly fees, and tempting add-ons, such as free domains, make it an attractive option for new webmasters. In this video, I'll breakdown the offerings of three of the most permanent WordPress hosting providers, and put real numbers next to different aspects of their performance to help you choose the best hosting this year. The monthly figures offered are extremely affordable. We decided to go for a stripped down WordPress install to make comparisons as fair as possible. Each install will use WordPress with the standard 2015 theme, and all plugins and caches disabled. In terms of performance, each WordPress install was tested in the following two ways. One, page load tests with Pingdom.
Best WordPress HOSTING 2018 -
The home page is loaded from three separate locations and the results tabulated. And number two, basic load testing with load impact. We use load impact to simulate up to 40 concurrent users hitting the homepage over a five minute period. The figures you see here are based on test runs with servers geographically close to the WordPress installations themselves. We also since checked the results with limited tests on more geographically disperse. Due to the nature of Wordpress hosting, there is no magic, single definitive test that will hold true under all circumstances. What we are looking for here were illustrative page load times and reasonable overlay performance indicators at low usage levels. Remember that your mileage may and probably will vary. Let's move on to our candidates, the allegedly best Wordpress hosting providers.
At SiteGround, we went for the startup package. Although for a generally more WordPress optimized package, we'd recommend the GrowBig plan. It's a tad more expensive but it comes with additional features, free SSL, and priority support. Initial sign up with this shared [INAUDIBLE] hosting plan was simple and to the point. The back end impressed as well with its presentation of a carefully considered initial set of options. Not surprisingly, the only install on the list hosted on a European server performed particularly well from Amsterdam. Melbourne, on the other hand, was underwhelming.
Best WordPress HOSTING 2018��
On load impact, the minimum and the maximum response time was both under a second. There were superb times on a geographically close test server, but we experienced more variance with different [INAUDIBLE]. SiteGround has an online reputation rate of by users. InMotion offers a lot of hosting options, but we wanted to look into the ones that are optimized for Wordpress specifically. So we went into the WordPress hosting section and selected the plan called Launch. This one is the most affordable. The great thing about it is that you get SSD disk space without any additional fees. Also, you can have two websites on this plan. InMotion shows good performance near the server location, and also reasonably good results for Europe and Australia. This isn't the fastest host on this list, but surely nothing we'd call uncomfortable. The performance results on load impact are good up until the 10 concurrent users mark, at which point it takes a slight dip, but then important source restores around 20 concurrent users and stays somewhat level up until even 50 users. Overall, more than enough for normal usage and server load. The plan we tested with WP Engine is called Personal and it's the entry level plan.
Best WordPress HOSTING 2018��
As part of it, you are allowed to have one Wordpress install, and it can handle up to 25,000 visits a month, so probably more than enough for most new websites. The server location for Pingdom test was California. WP Engine shows great performance when accessing the site from a New York server, even though New York and California are properly away. European connections are also really good. Lastly, Melbourne connections get a bit lower performance. On load impact, we got really good performance across the whole spectrum. The number of concurrent user connections had little impact on the results. In Olympic style to highlight that all services are surprisingly gold, we'll hand out go to the website medals accordingly. We'd like to stress that none of the shared WordPress hosting providers here failed any test. The overall standard was refreshingly high.